Updating Systematic Reviews: An International Survey
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Updating Systematic Reviews: An International Survey
BACKGROUND Systematic reviews (SRs) should be up to date to maintain their importance in informing healthcare policy and practice. However, little guidance is available about when and how to update SRs. Moreover, the updating policies and practices of organizations that commission or produce SRs are unclear. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS The objective was to describe the updating practices a...
متن کاملAn Introduction to Living Systematic Reviews
سخن سردبیر Editorial مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی رفسنجان دوره 20، اردیبهشت 1400، 146-145 درآمدی بر مرورهای نظام‌مند زنده An Introduction to Living Systematic Reviews محسن رضائیان[1] M. Rezaeian تا کنون در سخنان سردبیری مجله دانشگاه، درباره انواع مقالات مروری، مطالب گوناگونی را به رشته تحریر در آورده‌ایم. هدف از نگارش این مقالات، آشنا ساختن خوانندگان و نویسندگان فرهیخته م...
متن کاملDoes updating improve the quality of reporting of systematic reviews?
1 Community Information and Epidemiological Technologies (CIET), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada and VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam the Netherlands. 2 Professor of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 3 Professor and Director, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Health Research Institute, Depar...
متن کاملRole of Citation Tracking in Updating of Systematic Reviews
We proposed to use automatic citation tracking to enhance the retrieval of new evidence for updating Systematic Reviews (SR). We tested on a Cochrane review from 2003 (updated 2010) and retrieved 12 of the papers to be added (recall 85.7%). Citation tracking yields a high proportion of the required literature.
متن کاملUpdating search strategies for systematic reviews using EndNote
Performing, writing, and publishing a systematic review take a long time. In a cohort of journalpublished systematic reviews, Cochrane reviews, and health technology assessment reports, the median time lag between the stated last search date and publication was 61 weeks (interquartile range, 33–87 weeks) [1]. In the same cohort of reviews, 7% were out of date at the time of publication [2]. Mor...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: PLoS ONE
سال: 2010
ISSN: 1932-6203
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009914